WSJ on Dogs vs Cats

I came across this article in the Wall Street Journal last weekend and forgot I hadn't posted it. The link may or may not work because the WSJ is a subscription site, so I'm including the text below. Note I had a post back in 2009 on the same subject, with the same findings, from an article in New Scientist.
Now, my problem with these "dogs vs. cats" IQ studies is that, just as with the human species, you can have smart dogs and dumb dogs, and smart cats and dumb cats. In the 30 or so dogs we have here, we see a wide range in "cognitive prowess." Our little blind Goldie, who we lost last year, could open zippers and backpacks with her teeth and bi-fold closet doors with her paws. The only thing that prevents Widget from sneaking off at night in one of our trucks and driving to McDonalds is her lack of thumbs and her impossibly short legs. We have other dogs who may have plenty of attitude but not a whole lot of aptitude.
And, let's face it, certainly some dog breeds seem to be a bit more agile mentally than others. (Sensibly, I won't be naming any!) So it occurs to me that the results of these studies could vary wildly depending on which individual animals are included in the testing.
That said, here's the WSJ piece:

Why Dogs Are Smarter Than Cats

A not-so-smart best friend? Experiments in language and cognition show Fido's (sporadic) brilliance

By Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods 

With half as many neurons in their cerebral cortex as cats—and half the attitude, some would say—dogs are often taken to be the less intelligent domestic partner. While dogs drink out of the toilet, slavishly follow their master and need a chaperone to relieve themselves, cats hunt self-sufficiently and survey their empire with a regal gaze.

But cats beware. Research in recent years has finally revealed the genius of dogs.

 Like other language-trained animals—dolphins, parrots, bonobos—dogs can learn to respond to hundreds of spoken signals associated with different objects. What sets dogs apart is how they learn these words.

If you show a child a red block and a green block, and then ask for the chromium block, not the red block, most children will give you the green block, despite not knowing that the word "chromium" can refer to a shade of green. Children infer the name of the object. They know that you can't be referring to the red block.

In 2004, Juliane Kaminski from Britain's University of Portsmouth and her colleagues published the results of a similar experiment with a dog called Rico who knew the names of hundreds of objects.

Dr. Kaminski showed Rico an object that he had never seen before, along with seven other toys that he knew by name. Then she asked Rico to fetch a toy using a word that was new to him, like "Sigfried." Just like human tots with the word "chromium," Rico was immediately able to infer that "Sigfried" referred to the new toy. Since the report on Rico, several other dogs have also been shown to make inferences this way. Dogs are the only animals that have demonstrated this humanlike ability.

Based on the ability of cats to hold a grudge, you might think that they have better memories than dogs. Not so. Several years ago, Sylvain Fiset of Canada's University of Moncton and colleagues reported experiments in which a dog or cat watched while a researcher hid a reward in one of four boxes. After a delay, they were allowed to search for the treat. Cats started guessing after only one minute. But even after four minutes, dogs hadn't forgotten where they saw the food.

Still, dog owners should not be too smug. In 2010, Krista Macpherson and William Roberts of the University of Western Ontario published a study that tested navigational memory, in which dogs had to search for food in a maze with eight arms radiating out from a central position. The researchers then looked at rats previously given the same test. They beat dogs by a wide margin.

Even the dog's closest relative, the wolf, beat its cousin when food was placed on the opposite side of a fence, as shown in a 1982 study by Harry and Martha Frank of the University of Michigan. In 2001, Peter Pongrácz and colleagues from Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary published a study with an important qualification to this earlier finding: When the experimenters showed dogs a human rounding the fence first, the dogs could solve the problem immediately.

This is the secret to the genius of dogs: It's when dogs join forces with us that they become special.

Nowhere is this clearer than when dogs are reading our gestures. Every dog owner has helped her dog find a lost ball or treat by pointing in the right direction. No other animal—not even our closest relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees—can interpret our gestures as flexibly as dogs.

So are dogs smarter than cats? In a sense, but only if we cling to a linear scale of intelligence that places sea sponges at the bottom and humans at the top. Species are designed by nature to be good at different things.

And what might the genius of cats be? Possibly, that they just can't be bothered playing our silly games or giving us the satisfaction of discovering the extent of their intelligence.

—Dr. Hare is the director of the Duke Canine Cognition Center, and Ms. Woods is a research scientist at Duke University. This essay is adapted from their new book, "The Genius of Dogs," published by Dutton.

—–

Posted in

5 responses to “Dogs vs. Cats Again”

  1. Anne in FL Avatar
    Anne in FL

    Dogs v cats…I like your findings Steve. There are some smarter than others. I know a man w/ a PhD in Biophysics who is brilliant. In his field. He is not so bright socially and cant figure out how to fix some easy fix-its. Another I know dropped out of high school but can figure out how to fix/put together/how to work anything he sees. IQ is a broad topic. Animals fall onto a bell curve too I am sure.
    Personally my cat Cooper is much smarter than my little dog. But I love them each for who they are and what they can do. Just wish Cooper would stop bringing lizards into the house to play with, yuck.

    Like

  2. Barb Ribinski Avatar
    Barb Ribinski

    Thank you for this article. I always enjoy reading info like this, even though I’m never surprised at how intelligent animals are. How people can think of a creature as “just an animal” always astounds me. They just don’t seem to understand how all living things have feelings and a level of intelligence. And I couldn’t help but laugh at your comment about Widget. I didn’t realize that she was so smart. I hope Louie is feeling better. I’ll be glad to see a photo of him when his poor face has healed. Keep safe with the snow this weekend.

    Like

  3. Jessica, NL Avatar
    Jessica, NL

    “Based on the ability of cats to hold a grudge”, hahaha….at least they know a cat!
    what I find very clever of some of those dogs is how they find the ‘new’ toy, and it equally amazes me that a human brain works like that 🙂

    Like

  4. Ann Avatar
    Ann

    I’ve always been a dog person, but in the 1980’s I had a cat named Barney (actually, he was my children’s cat). The dogs taught him to beg, open the pantry to get the treats and other little things. If he could have barked, he would have! He was a very smart cat. The other cat we had, Knuckles, was not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he was still a good cat.
    I’ve had many, many dogs over the years and some were extremely smart, others, not so much. But I loved them all the same 🙂

    Like

  5. Peggy S. Avatar
    Peggy S.

    Love the Boston…looks just like my Scooter, who has us very well trained to obey his every command and tend to his every need. And I think I’m so smart. Ha!

    Like

Leave a comment